The First Principle of Transcriptomics (Expanded by adding Figure 1A)
An Analog of the First Law of Thermodynamics
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D. (with ChatGPT assistance)
Emeritus Professor of Theoretical Cell Biology
Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ
September 23, 2025
1. Introduction: From Thermodynamics to Transcriptomics
In the 19th century, physicists discovered the First Law of Thermodynamics: energy can neither be created nor destroyed, only transformed from one form into another. This insight revolutionized our understanding of the physical world, uniting heat, work, and energy under a single principle of conservation.
In the 21st century, transcriptomics—the study of gene expression at a genome-wide scale (see Figure 1) — has reached a similar turning point. Increasingly, evidence shows that living systems respond to diverse stressors and interventions not with infinite variety, but with conserved patterns of gene expression. These patterns represent what I called the First Principle of Transcriptomics (FPT) [1], which can be stated as:
“Across biological, social, and pharmacological domains, (8/30/2025/1)
the human genome responds with conserved transcriptional
programs, reflecting a principle of conservation of information.”
2. The Building Blocks: CTRC, CTRA, and CTRI
Three well-established phenomena illustrate FPT:
1. Conserved Transcriptional Response to Cancer (CTRC) [2]
Despite differences in tissue of origin and mutational profiles, many cancers exhibit a shared transcriptional signature: upregulation of stress and proliferation pathways, downregulation of metabolic and differentiation genes.2. Conserved Transcriptional Response to Adversity (CTRA)
Social genomics [3] has shown that chronic stress, loneliness, and low socioeconomic status induce a predictable leukocyte transcriptional profile: increased pro-inflammatory gene expression, reduced antiviral responses, and altered antibody synthesis.3. Conserved Transcriptional Response to Intervention (CTRI)
Pharmacological agents, from beta-blockers to antidepressants, also trigger stereotyped shifts in gene expression, reflecting the cell’s finite repertoire of response pathways.
Together, CTRC, CTRA, and CTRI demonstrate that gene expression is constrained by conserved, system-level rules.
3. The First Principle of Transcriptomics (FPT)
Just as the First Law of Thermodynamics unifies physical transformations, the FPT unifies biological responses:
· Inputs: Biological insults (cancer), social adversity, pharmacological interventions.
· Process: A conserved transcriptional machinery (DNA → RNA → protein) operating under universal rules.
· Outputs: Health, behavior, clinical and systemic adaptation.
In short, the genome does not improvise infinitely—it plays variations on conserved themes.
And just as energy conservation provides a bedrock principle for physics, information conservation provides a bedrock principle for transcriptomics.
4. Energy, Information, and Gnergy
To fully capture the analogy, we must recognize that Energy and Information are complementary aspects of a deeper, third entity, which I have termed Gnergy [4].
· Energy represents the capacity to do work.
· Information represents the capacity to control work.
· Gnergy unifies these dual aspects, much as wave and particle are complementary in quantum physics [4].
The First Principle of Transcriptomics thus reflects a gnergic conservation principle: conserved transcriptional responses are the biological manifestation of the conservation of information, just as energy transformations express the conservation of energy.
5. Visual Representation of the FPT
Figure 1: Cancer (C), adversity (A), and interventions (I) all converge on a conserved transcriptional response (CTR), which in turn shapes health and behavior. This cycle parallels the conservation of energy across physical systems, but here highlights the conservation of information as a manifestation of Gnergy.
Figure 1. An expanded and more detailed version of Figure 1, which now includes as inputs ‘meditation’, ‘music’, and ‘acupuncture’.
6. Why This Matters
1. Integrative Biology: The FPT links oncology, social genomics, and pharmacology into one framework.
2. Predictive Medicine: Understanding conserved transcriptional responses enables better biomarkers for disease risk, resilience, and treatment response.
3. Philosophical Implication: Just as thermodynamics reshaped physics, the FPT may reshape biology by providing a universal principle of transcriptomic conservation—rooted in Gnergy.
7. Conclusion: Toward a New Biology
“If the First Law of Thermodynamics is the cornerstone of physics, the First Principle of Transcriptomics may become a cornerstone of 21st-century biology. By recognizing that cancer, social adversity, and interventions converge on shared gene expression programs, we can begin to unify the molecular language of life [5] under a principle of conservation of information.”
In this light, gene expression is not chaos—it is choreography. The genome responds to the world not with randomness, but with conserved transcriptional dances, echoing the deeper unity of Energy and Information within Gnergy.
Reference:
[1] Ji, S. (2018). The Cell Language Theory: Connecting Mind and Matter. World Scientific Publishing, New Jersey. Pp. 330-332.
[2] Cole, S. W. (2012) Nervous system regulation of the cancer genome. Brain Behav Immun 30(Suppl): S10–S18.
[3] Sociogenomics. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociogenomics
[4] Ji, S. (1991). Biocybernetics: Machine Theory of Biology. In: Molecular Theories of Cell Life and Death (S. Ji, ed.), Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, N.J. Pp. 152, 160, 488.
[5] Ji, S. (2018). The Cell Language Theory: Connecting Mind and Matter. World Scientific Publishing, New Jersey.


What a great analysis of epigenetics and the First Law of Thermodynamics. Thank you!
My only observation is the limitation of the framework of FTP in integrative biology. It seems restricted to pharmacology which has as its aim of blocking or intersecting biological activity. This is not necessarily wrong in every case but often with pharmacology the bad effects are caused by synthetic alteration and produce unintended cascading events.
It might be significant to include bionutrition or even replace pharmacology with its much more expansive options of historical benefits from the many areas of medical science. One other factor is the electromagnetic energy of the body and how it is being affected by extremely high exposure levels that now causes major mutation, oxidative stress, metabolic dysfunction and chronic inflammation. This factor is continually ignored by allopathic medicine.
It seems that the area of bionutrition is where the body responds more efficiently and safely. What comes to mind is the work of Randy Jirtle at Duke University. It was his first experiment that shocked him the greatest when a few simple B vitamins were given to Agouti rats and their young were born healthy.
The promise of the future was to find the SNPPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) and treat them with nutrition. Then the focused changed to a much more lucrative orientation.